This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

Top 100 Maintainers List - 19990820

Previous message (by thread): Top 100 Maintainers List - 19990820
Next message (by thread): Top 100 Maintainers List - 19990820

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Joao Luis Silva Damas joao at ripe.net
Mon Aug 23 18:23:03 CEST 1999

They must have the same name AND the same telephone number not just the
same name.

Two distinct persons can definitely have the same name but if they also
have the same phone number, it is almost certainly the same person.

Regards,
Joao Damas
RIPE NCC

At 12:57 +0200 23/8/99, Paul Rolland wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Just one thing I'd like to point out : MUL_IDENTICAL seem to be based
>only on the person: field.... This seems to be fairly easy, but quite
>easy to be inaccurate...
>
>Could it be possible to think of something more precise that could help
>avoiding 'false' alarms ?
>
>Regards,
>Paul

Previous message (by thread): Top 100 Maintainers List - 19990820
Next message (by thread): Top 100 Maintainers List - 19990820

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]