This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
how to proceed with changed:
- Previous message (by thread): how to proceed with changed:
- Next message (by thread): how to proceed with changed:
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Tue Jun 9 10:28:01 CEST 1998
James Aldridge wrote: > Why not just use NIC/RIPE-handles in the changed field? As long as the this covers only part of the functionality. Handles travel with persons when they change jobs. It would be too cumbersome to change all "changed:"-fields once a "changer" leaves the registry/company. There are ways to deal with this problem if only email addresses are used. > 8601:1988, perhaps) would, IMHO, be useful although it should probably be > added by the database software rather than by the user submitting the > update. It could even be omitted as part of the database entry and just be returned in a (comment) line starting with '%'. It is meta-information anyway. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): how to proceed with changed:
- Next message (by thread): how to proceed with changed:
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]