This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

how to proceed with changed:

Previous message (by thread): how to proceed with changed:
Next message (by thread): how to proceed with changed:

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Peter Koch pk at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Tue Jun 9 10:28:01 CEST 1998

James Aldridge wrote:

> Why not just use NIC/RIPE-handles in the changed field?  As long as the
this covers only part of the functionality. Handles travel with persons when
they change jobs. It would be too cumbersome to change all "changed:"-fields
once a "changer" leaves the registry/company. There are ways to deal with
this problem if only email addresses are used.

> 8601:1988, perhaps) would, IMHO, be useful although it should probably be
> added by the database software rather than by the user submitting the
> update.
It could even be omitted as part of the database entry and just be returned
in a (comment) line starting with '%'. It is meta-information anyway.

-Peter

Previous message (by thread): how to proceed with changed:
Next message (by thread): how to proceed with changed:

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]