This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

"changed" field should be deleted

Previous message (by thread): "changed" field should be deleted
Next message (by thread): "changed" field should be deleted

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Peter Koch pk at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Fri Jun 5 19:32:49 CEST 1998

> "Other users" are not really interested in the real e-mail address
> of changer. This field is needed only by administrators who want to
> delete the object because they have to send back the exact copy of
> the record.

"Other users" are at least interested in the latest modification date
and the address of someone to report problems to. When I find wrong
information (mostly bouncing email addresses) in an entry I usually
send a note to the address in the last "changed" line.

SPAM hysterics is a problem. There are reasons to review the use
and purpose of the "changed" field. But let us not tie both topics.

-Peter

Previous message (by thread): "changed" field should be deleted
Next message (by thread): "changed" field should be deleted

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]