This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

"changed" field should be deleted

Previous message (by thread): "changed" field should be deleted
Next message (by thread): "changed" field should be deleted

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Daniel Karrenberg Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net
Fri Jun 5 16:43:55 CEST 1998

  > Joe Abley <jabley at clear.co.nz> writes:
  > 
  > Perhaps the displayed/retrieved version of the "changed" field should
  > include a message-id instead of the e-mail address? These are supposed to
  > be unique, and usually contain a hostname/FQDN that is probably sufficient
  > to identify the updater.
  > 
  > I am assuming that the vast majority of people make updates using
  > e-mail...

Can we limit the discussion to the quick fix of hiding
the changed field for standard queries. 
The re-design of the audit trail has been discussed before and
should be considered thoroughly based on a proposal covering
all aspects.

Daniel

Previous message (by thread): "changed" field should be deleted
Next message (by thread): "changed" field should be deleted

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]