This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Who should do entries in RIPE database?
- Previous message (by thread): Who should do entries in RIPE database?
- Next message (by thread): Who should do entries in RIPE database?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
NCC local-ir list Moderator
lir-mod at ripe.net
Thu Oct 30 14:16:21 CET 1997
------- Forwarded Message From: Christian Kratzer <ck at toplink.net> Message-Id: <199710301109.MAA17929 at toplink1.toplink.net> Subject: Re: Who should do entries in RIPE database? To: schiefne at contrib.com (Carsten Schiefner) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 12:09:58 +0100 (MET) Cc: local-ir at ripe.net In-Reply-To: <3456024C.70C28953 at contrib.com> from "Carsten Schiefner" at Oct 28, 97 04:18:36 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1555 Hi > As a result of a voluminous discussion with one of POPs I would like to > point your interest on the following topic I am a little bit upset of: > > Almost everybody who knows about about the RIPE database schema (which > is no secret at all!) can do entries just by sending a mail to > 'auto-dbm at ripe.net'. This leads to an overwhelming bunch of multiple, > bad maintained or what-ever-you-want entries - especially person > objects - without any fun in grepping through them and selecting the > right one to create a new object. Example: > > There are four(!) entries for the entity "Joerg Schmidt" of "ZWF > Digitale Informations Technologie GmbH": JS893-RIPE, JS1161-RIPE, > JS1163-RIPE and JS1438-RIPE. This should be definitely stopped! > > My idea is that we should discuss future restrictions on the possibility > for everybody to put entries in the RIPE database, maybe by setting up > and maintaing access lists for every LIR. > > For me this database is a central tool in my daily work and I am very > interested in keeping quality and reliability of stored data as high > as possible. it would propably be sufficient to require a passphrase for auto-dbm at ripe.net so only regisitiers with registered passwords could submit entries or change records. This would definetely keep the "internet experts" from mucking around in the database.d Greetings Christian - -- TopLink GbR, Internet Services info at toplink.net Christian Kratzer http://www.toplink.net/ Phone: +49 7032 2701-0 Fax: +49 7032 2701-19 FreeBSD spoken here! ------- End of Forwarded Message
- Previous message (by thread): Who should do entries in RIPE database?
- Next message (by thread): Who should do entries in RIPE database?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]