This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
Who should do entries in RIPE database?
- Previous message (by thread): Who should do entries in RIPE database?
- Next message (by thread): Who should do entries in RIPE database?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Janos Zsako
zsako at banknet.net
Mon Nov 3 12:20:42 CET 1997
> From owner-db-wg at ripe.net Mon Nov 3 11:27:09 1997 > > What about creating two databases? (Two categories of objects.) > > One for objects sent by non-registries, > > and one for well maintained, authentic objects. > > This may be an orthogonal categorization. Sorry, but many of the duplicates > (triplicates ...) already carry the "mnt-by" attribute, sometimes > even two instances the same one. There is another problem too: some objects do have a mnt-by, however the mntner has auth: NONE! :( Can we assume that these objects are well maintained? My answer is: no. Janos PS. I have seen this with both inetnum and route objects.
- Previous message (by thread): Who should do entries in RIPE database?
- Next message (by thread): Who should do entries in RIPE database?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]