This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Proposal for db change
- Previous message (by thread): Changing rrdb objects in the future
- Next message (by thread): Proposal for db change
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John LeRoy Crain
John.Crain at ripe.net
Wed Apr 16 14:22:20 CEST 1997
Hello folks, I was sitting here getting annoyed at people who forget to add "source:" fields when I had a thought; Would it be useful to have the "source:" field added automatically when people forget it? I am assuming here that all updates to auto-dbm at ripe.net should contain "source: RIPE". The update could take place and a warning could be issued. _______________________ Warning "source:" field missing The field "source: RIPE" has been added to your object. _______________________ My experience is that many people forget to add "source:" fields and the objects get rejected. As the field should always be the same would it not be useful to update it and generate a warning? Your opinions would be appreciated, Kind regards, John Crain RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): Changing rrdb objects in the future
- Next message (by thread): Proposal for db change
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]