This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Changing rrdb objects in the future
- Previous message (by thread): Tools based on whois -t output.
- Next message (by thread): Changing rrdb objects in the future
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joe Abley
jabley at clear.co.nz
Tue Apr 8 18:54:08 CEST 1997
Apologies if this is the wrong forum to bring this up... It would appear that current implementations of the e-mail gateway which lets you update RR records impose a restriction on the date field to prevent people from entering dates that appear to be in the future - records like that are returned with an error. This is a bit of a pain for people in NZ and Australia, who are typically 18-20 hours ahead of RR machines located in the US, and are hence generally the date is a day ahead. It means that every time we make an update to an RR, we have to date the modification with the previous day's date. Now this isn't a really serious problem or anything, but it is annoying. Could the RRDB not store date and time records in (say) UTC, and convert local times supplied with timezones before sanity-checking dates that appear to be in the future? Joe -- Joe Abley <jabley at clear.co.nz> CLEAR Communications Ltd Systems Engineer, ISD http://www.clear.co.nz/
- Previous message (by thread): Tools based on whois -t output.
- Next message (by thread): Changing rrdb objects in the future
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]