This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
interesting person entry...
- Previous message (by thread): interesting person entry...
- Next message (by thread): interesting person entry...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joachim Schmitz
Schmitz at rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Thu Sep 26 22:09:09 CEST 1996
Dear David, you wrote as reply to my mail: > From: davidk at isi.edu > Message-Id: <9609261851.AA00711 at old.isi.edu> > Subject: Re: interesting person entry... > To: noc at noc.dfn.de > Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 11:51:51 -0700 (PDT) > Cc: db-wg at ripe.net (Database Working Group) [...] > > by accident I discovered a person entry which in its form is definitely > > not wanted: > > > > *pn: Stefan Seiz > > *ad: Herdweg 73 > > *ad: \ > > ... > 128 empty address lines!!! > > *ad: / > > *ad: 70174 Stuttgart > > *ad: Germany [...] > > I am in no position to decide whether the entry was done including these > > empty lines or whether this is an error of the database software. > > I am in such a position and found indeed a bug (It was the power of two > that made me feel that there was a bigger problem then at first sight). > > I could quickly trace the problem *and* have fixed the code. Great! Thank you very much for this fast debugging! (and that it was done remotely from ISI ;-) [...] > The database working group might want to decide to completely disallow > empty attribute lines inside a (non empty) attribute. > > I personally feel that this should be done through the config file: give > every attribute a property of allowed empty lines or not. For example > 'remarks:' lines can be read easier when they may contain empty lines > while empty rev-srv: lines are useless. > Wilfried: I suggest a collection of all attributes should be analyzed to see where empty lines are useful and where not. I currently do not have an overview of all attributes but I feel that - single ones - attributes used as reference (e.g. tech-c) - attributes necessary for administrative database purposes (e.g. changed or source) must not be empty (just as it came to my mind). I wonder how many attributes might be left over which could carry empty lines. I feel that the address attribute should not have empty lines. However, empty lines could be useful as David noted on the remark attribute. I guess this might be a point for the agenda of RIPE26... Thank you, David for this fast repsonse! Regards Joachim _____________________________________________________________________________ DFN Network Operation Center, Dr. Joachim Schmitz, (finger help at noc.dfn.de) >>>>>> mailto: noc at noc.dfn.de <<<<<< Rechenzentrum Universitaet Stuttgart, Allmandring 30, D-70550 Stuttgart Phone: 0711-685-5810, 0711-685-5576, FAX +711 6788363 (business hours) EMERGENCY phone +711 1319 139 with answering machine and pager _____________________________________________________________________________
- Previous message (by thread): interesting person entry...
- Next message (by thread): interesting person entry...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]