This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
polling for ripe dbase software changes (fwd)
- Previous message (by thread): polling for ripe dbase software changes (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): polling for ripe dbase software changes (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Tue Mar 19 14:12:25 CET 1996
Hi Cengiz, hi David! >We would like to hear the opinion (positive or negative) of the RIPE >database working group on the following proposals *before* changes are >made to any of the RIPE database implementations. We might want to >discuss things at the RIPE database working group session at the next >RIPE meeting in Berlin. Well, before I can develop an opinion, I'd be interested in the motivation and/or expected benefits for the proposed modifications. My first *feeling* (note, nothing more than a feeling!) is that things that belong to an external representation and a user interface should not be part of the data stored in some database. Another aspect might be multi-language support. Of coure, you can translate the syntactic sugar into syntactic salt :-) BTW, my feeling (again) with regard to the continuation stuff is that it might make sense to improve things. As it stands right now, it is not really simple to comprehend (for humans). Give me more input, then I can make up my mind. Best regards, Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): polling for ripe dbase software changes (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): polling for ripe dbase software changes (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]