This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
another lookup problem
- Previous message (by thread): another lookup problem
- Next message (by thread): another lookup problem
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Wed Jul 24 13:10:41 CEST 1996
Hi David(s) ! =>=To what end? Is the purpose of the database registration information =>=lookup or a more general white pages service? I' would suggest the =>=former and leave the latter to the WHOIS++/LDAP/X.500 crowd. What's the *inherent technology* difference between a registration lookup and a general white pages service? Sure, ultimately the number of entries... As soon as we have a production environment with these tools (both from technology, software, coverage, logistics and web access) I'll be happy to move ;-) ==> ==> - local langauge problems (European National Character Sets) which make ==> it difficult to find out about a (arbitrarily chosen) transcription. = =Local language problems? Heh. Let me introduce you to traditional =Chinese with all 100,000+ characters :-). Thank you. For the time being I just (have to) appreciate them as a piece of art. Unfortunately I lack the time to dive into that to the degree I would like to master. But if there is any special consideration of transcribing these letters (well, more local language independent symbols?) into 7bit ASCII for a DB I'd be happy to be clued in. What I was primarily referring to is the 7bit transcription of European local languages for "funny" characters. While I don't know about other countries, e.g. I'm perfectly aware that even *within the German region*, there is differences in defined transcriptions: AT (and DE?) a "sharp s" is formally written as "sz" but usually we use the "ss" form in everyday transactions. CH the same is written as "ss" For Scandinavia there is a couple of different umlauts with double dots, crossing an "o" or ligatures, etc. Do you reaaly know about the transcription? => The advantage of the whois =>database serving as a simple registered object lookup mechanism is =>that you don't have to worry (too much) about gunk like local language =>support -- the registration database access method (whois) allows =>lookups on registry objects, namely inetnums, handles, domains, route =>objects, etc. of which people (generally :-)) are not a part. Then I don't understand why we have the recursive lookup for person objects... =Yes, I'm arguing person: field contents should not be indexed, but =I've been known as a radical in the past. Note this would have =solved the problem that brought this issue up (I think). Well, reality differs. Those of us who have to work with end-users have to process a lot of requests that involve dealing with person objects. Whether they are directly indexed or just referenced doesn't make a big difference. I want to find out whether some guy or gal is already in the DB - full stop. And it's more comfortable to do that with a wildcard replacing a "sharp s" or an umlau than being "radical" and try all the different possibilities that I can imageine. => - comments from other environments, where the lack of this feature was => quoted as a major obstacle to use this software 'cause this => functionality is provided right now. = =If all you have is a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail. =This doesn't mean you should attach a blender to your hammer to allow =making more consistent puree... Thank you :-) I just wonder why you need a blender when you've got a hammer? Just kidding :-) Wilfried. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wilfried Woeber : e-mail: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at Computer Center - ACOnet : Vienna University : Tel: +43 1 4065822 355 Universitaetsstrasse 7 : Fax: +43 1 4065822 170 A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe : NIC: WW144 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): another lookup problem
- Next message (by thread): another lookup problem
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]