This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
- Previous message (by thread): Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
- Next message (by thread): Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David.Kessens at ripe.net
David.Kessens at ripe.net
Fri Jan 19 17:36:04 CET 1996
Hi Christian, > Christian Panigl, ACOnet/UniVie +43 1 4065822-383 writes : > > maybe there is another solution: migrate the "country" attribute to a > "registry" attribute which should hold the responsible registry name I like the proposal since we will need a registry object once anyway. However, there is one big con: > > david writes: > > > > Since we are dealing with a small, though highly visible problem we need > > easy and quick fixes to avoid putting too much work in something that's > > not really worth it ;-). > Pros: > > easy (?) to implement I am afraid we can better take this out of the pros list and add the following to the cons list: Cons: needs a lot of design work for a proper registry object, might also take quite some implementation work depending on the design we choose. Another complication might be that we still want to have a 'country:' attribute defined for the registry object that will suffer the same problems we have with the inetnum objects. I think it is best to first think about the 'country:' attribute and then, for the longer term see if we can fetch the whole thing into a registry object. But don't get me wrong, I like the idea and the design work might turn out as very useful since we will need a registry object anyway some time in the future, Kind regards, David Kessens ----- > > Example: > > inetnum: 193.0.0.0 - 193.255.255.255 > country: RIPE > > will be modified when entering the DB to > > inetnum: 193.0.0.0 - 193.255.255.255 > registry: RIPE > > inetnum: 193.170.16.0 > registry: at.aconet > > Pros: > > Solves the problem completely, is politically correct, easy (?) to implement > > Cons: > > will break applications which query for the "country" attribute, are > there any ? Alternatively you might add the "registry" attribute and > obsolte the country attribute. > > Regards > Christian > > --- Christian Panigl : Vienna University Computer Center - ACOnet --- > --- VUCC - ACOnet : -------------------------------------------- --- > --- Universitaetsstrasse 7 : Internet: Christian.Panigl at CC.UniVie.ac.at --- > --- A-1010 Vienna / Austria : Tel: +43 1 4065822-383 (Fax: -170) --- > >
- Previous message (by thread): Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
- Next message (by thread): Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]