This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Draft Guarded Field document
- Previous message (by thread): Draft Guarded Field document
- Next message (by thread): Draft Guarded Field document
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Havard Eidnes
Havard.Eidnes at runit.sintef.no
Fri Jan 21 11:49:55 CET 1994
Hi, just a small comment: > 3. The Basic Procedure > > For each of the guarded attributes detailed above, a list of all > networks having this attribute is kept separately from the general > database itself. These lists (also called `guarded files') will be > maintained and be served as the `only' source of membership informa- > tion used in the database. Normal database updates `never' change > these attributes. If an update includes such an attribute and a > discrepancy between the values in the update and those in the data- > base is found, a diagnostic message will be sent to the originator > of the update and the guarded value(s) will not be affected. What about the rest of the attributes if the object contains a mismatched guarded field? Will they be updated, or will the whole object be rejected (I assume the latter). I assume the answer to this question will be evident when I produce the first "guarded-reject" update, but it would be nice to have this stated clearly in the text as well. I have no other comments -- this looks good as far as I can see. - Havard
- Previous message (by thread): Draft Guarded Field document
- Next message (by thread): Draft Guarded Field document
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]