This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Invalid data in the RIPE database
- Previous message (by thread): Invalid data in the RIPE database
- Next message (by thread): Invalid data in the RIPE database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Willem van der Scheun
Willem.vanderScheun at sara.nl
Tue Apr 26 10:04:04 CEST 1994
> > Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net> writes > * > * > Laurent Joncheray <lpj at merit.edu> writes: > * > Dear database managers, > * > i had a look at some entries in the RIPE database and at the > * > 'nsf-in' network attribute. For a lot of them the value in the RIPE > * > db is inconsistant with the Merit (NSF) database... > * > * More radical question: Considering that the NSFnet is going away and > * the routing registry has routing policy, should these attributes > * be deprecated or even removed totally? > > Jean-Michel writes > > * 1- obsolete this field. > * 2- Implement what Laurent proposes (automatic download from Merit). > > I feel for Daniels and Jean-Michel's first option. They should > definately be deprecated (although I have always viewed them as info > only attibutes) and preferably removed. Although some people may find > this information useful currently, wrong information is worse than no > information. I'd say obsolete. > I second that one. -- Willem
- Previous message (by thread): Invalid data in the RIPE database
- Next message (by thread): Invalid data in the RIPE database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]