This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Obsoleting "connect"
- Previous message (by thread): Obsoleting "connect"
- Next message (by thread): Obsoleting "connect"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Havard Eidnes
Havard.Eidnes at runit.sintef.no
Wed Sep 22 23:10:47 CEST 1993
Hi, if my memory serves me well, I think the RIPE DB working group concluded to restrict the legal values for the "connect" field to only "LOCAL", and if wider connectivity for a net has been established to not use this attribute in the objects in the database. However, this is somewhat at odds with the current definition of the connect field in the inetnum template, where the attribute is mandatory. So what do you put in an object which has wider connectivity than internal to the "home" autonomous system? My proposal to progress this decision (as mentioned at the end of the RIPE meeting) is thus to initially demote the "connect" attribute from mandatory to optional, and later add stricter checks in the RIPE database software for the values of the connect attribute. Currently updates missing the connect field are being bounced (I know, I tried it while I was at the RIPE meeting :-) - Havard
- Previous message (by thread): Obsoleting "connect"
- Next message (by thread): Obsoleting "connect"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]