dom-net tag under domain

> 
> As Tony already said we'd rather not do that right now to avoid valatility
> in database semantics. Please note that this will be fixed automatically
> and in a very general manner once the database goes classless!
> 
> Suggestion: The dom-net field is a "hint" field only. It does not hurt at all
> to list the whole network even if only part of it is used by the particular
> domain. One net can appear in several domain objects.
> 
> Daniel

In principle I agree, but to apply your suggestion we would have to change
many entries which were written under the assumption that subnetworks were
allowed in dom-net...
We will rewrite dom-net: as remarks: dom-net: unless you can give us a piece
of perl software (to put before the sintax checker) which converts from
"subnet" to "whole net". Perl programmers are a very scarse resource here...

----------                                                     ----------
Antonio_Blasco Bonito                          E-Mail: bonito at nis.garr.it
GARR - Network Information Service      c=it;a=garr;p=garr;o=nis;s=bonito
c/o CNUCE - Istituto del CNR                         Tel: +39 (50) 593246
Via S. Maria, 36                                    Telex: 500371 CNUCE I
56126 PISA   Italy                                   Fax: +39 (50) 904052
----------                                                     ----------