This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles

• Previous message (by thread): Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles
• Next message (by thread): Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

David Randolph Conrad davidc at iij.ad.jp
Tue Jul 27 05:49:31 CEST 1993

>So it makes sense to have a single handle: field and have
>the assigning agency identified by a prefix on the handle ?

I think it is better than creating new tags for each NIC.  But instead
of a prefix, how about:

handle:  XXXXYYY at ncc.ripe.net
handle:  CCDDD at internic.net
handle:  CCDDDDJP at nic.ad.jp

etc.?  Or, if that might confuse NIC handles with email addresses,
replacing the @ with another character?

-drc

• Previous message (by thread): Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles
• Next message (by thread): Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]