This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
The addition of guarded fields
- Previous message (by thread): The addition of guarded fields
- Next message (by thread): The addition of guarded fields
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antonio_Blasco Bonito
bonito at nis.garr.it
Tue Jul 27 15:01:07 CEST 1993
---- Gilles Farrache writes: > > Marten, > > I think that the RIPE NCC have to split blocks. RIPE NCC is a > neutral organisation that can do it without problems. If we > do not agree on that, that means a very long procedure to update > the guarded fields, and I believe that no service provider > will want to rely on the efficiency of a NIC for its routing > policy. So that mean that nobody will use those fields for > routing, so the information may be completly out of date. I think we, as part of the european networking community, should pursue the spreading of technical knowledge among network providers and network operators. IP routing is not a trivial issue for the time being, and the best results in routing coordination is obtained, in my opinion, when the largest possible number of network operators do the right thing. This is the spirit of the Internet, I think. The NCC is a neutral organizations but this does not mean they should act on behalf of network operators. The net result could be a minor diffusion of relevant technical knowledge. Service providers and even large network users communities should know what they are doing when registering networks, creating guarded fields. Also, local registries (down the tree from the NCC) must improve their efficiency. The Internet is growing very very fast in Europe and we have to use solutions that scale. A do-all NCC is not the solution, I guess. I think the NCC is going is the opposite direction (i.e. proposing the PRIDE project, which I feel a very important activity in the next future) > But I agree with Blasco on one point, the maintainer of the block > must be inform that the block has been splitted Thank you, Gilles. ---------- ---------- Antonio_Blasco Bonito E-Mail: bonito at nis.garr.it GARR - Network Information Service c=it;a=garr;p=garr;o=nis;s=bonito c/o CNUCE - Istituto del CNR Tel: +39 (50) 593246 Via S. Maria, 36 Telex: 500371 CNUCE I 56126 PISA Italy Fax: +39 (50) 904052 ---------- ----------
- Previous message (by thread): The addition of guarded fields
- Next message (by thread): The addition of guarded fields
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]