This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
The addition of guarded fields
- Previous message (by thread): The addition of guarded fields
- Next message (by thread): The addition of guarded fields
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antonio_Blasco Bonito
bonito at nis.garr.it
Tue Jul 27 13:07:34 CEST 1993
---Marten writes: > People, > > I need your help on an implementation issue. I am working on the addition of > guarded fields, and especially on the splitting of blocks in case some nets > inside a block get different guarded fields than others. What I have > implemented currently is that a block will be split into biggest possible > parts containing the same guarded information, so for instance: > > inetnum: 193.252.0.0 - 193.252.254.0 > netname: FRANCE-TELECOM-BLOCK-5 > ... > > And then add an AS number (from guardian files) to network 1 and 2, and a > different one to 3 and 4, and leave the rest as it is, will result in: > > *in: 193.252.0.0 > *na: FR-TELECOM-BLOCK-5 > ... > > *in: 193.252.1.0 - 193.252.2.0 > *na: FR-TELECOM-BLOCK-5 > *as: AS1104 > ... > > *in: 193.252.3.0 - 193.252.4.0 > *na: FR-TELECOM-BLOCK-5 > *as: AS786 > ... > > *in: 193.252.5.0 - 193.252.254.0 > *na: FR-TELECOM-BLOCK-5 > ... > > > This procedure works nicely but I still have some problems with this: > > - its is VERY slow (and I do not know how to improve that) > - I still do not like the idea of splitting up blocks that are managed by > someone else > - In oder to keep the database size under control, we should also implement > generating blocks again from individual entries in the database, but then > again I am fiddling with someone elses data, which I do not like at all ... > > Could we get some opinions ? > > -Marten > I do not agree about someone else data modification. I think the NCC should do the following: 1-inform anyone who asks for a block of networks that if different guarded fields are needed in the future then splitted blocks have to be registered. 2-only the same people who has registered the block can request the splitting. 3-inforce the above rules in database registration software. ---------- ---------- Antonio_Blasco Bonito E-Mail: bonito at nis.garr.it GARR - Network Information Service c=it;a=garr;p=garr;o=nis;s=bonito c/o CNUCE - Istituto del CNR Tel: +39 (50) 593246 Via S. Maria, 36 Telex: 500371 CNUCE I 56126 PISA Italy Fax: +39 (50) 904052 ---------- ----------
- Previous message (by thread): The addition of guarded fields
- Next message (by thread): The addition of guarded fields
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]