This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles
- Previous message (by thread): Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles
- Next message (by thread): Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Tue Jul 27 10:24:20 CEST 1993
| * Given that one of the aims of handles is (I think !) a more | * compact, shorthand form of referring to someone, the RIPE-DR222 | * idea sounds better to me - DR222 at rs.internic.net is longer than | * my real name ! | |I have to agree here. I think a nice syntax would be: | |<NIC>-XXXYYY | |where it is probably is too much hastle to ask InterNIC to redo all their |nic-hdls to have INTERNIC-XXXYYY, so they probably keep the handles without |the NIC. The others could be: | |RIPE-MT2 |APNIC-MT2 |... My original reasoning was something like: Keep the InterNIC-Handles as they are, ie. when there is no NIC-ID, then let's assume it is InterNIC. For the others, tag them. For the DataBase, store everything without a (external) tag with an (internal) InterNIC tag. Also, I think it is really not necessary - maybe not even useful? - for people to obtain more than one handle. However if someone is hit by that, or even wants it :-), we could probably live (DataBase-wise) with a definition of (REQUIRED, MULTIPLE, UNIQUE). (Marten: could the DB-SW digest this?) |Question is, to what level do we go down for the NIC ? Should we go down to | |DENIC-MT2 |JANET-MT2 | |I don;t think so. My sense of NIC for the handles should be the highest level |IP number authorities in the area .... (ie continents) I think the question is, by whom and where these handles are dished out. My personal preference is to have this done at the highest possible level, ie. RIPE-NCC, APNIC, etc... Unfortunately, until now there have not been any contributions to this aspects. Regards, Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles
- Next message (by thread): Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]