This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles
- Previous message (by thread): Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles
- Next message (by thread): Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marten Terpstra
Marten.Terpstra at ripe.net
Tue Jul 27 10:11:47 CEST 1993
Duncan Rogerson <D.Rogerson at nosc.ja.net> writes * > handle: XXXXYYY at ncc.ripe.net * .. * > etc.? Or, if that might confuse NIC handles with email addresses, * > replacing the @ with another character? * * I think having something that looks like an e-mail address is * a bad idea, it's too confusing. * * Given that one of the aims of handles is (I think !) a more * compact, shorthand form of referring to someone, the RIPE-DR222 * idea sounds better to me - DR222 at rs.internic.net is longer than * my real name ! * * Dunc Another solution is to divide the numbers that go with the initials in a nic handle among the NICs, so for instance the NCC could give out nic handles that have numbers between 2000 and 4000, InterNIC 0-2000, APNIC 4000-6000 etcetera. This is similar to the address allocation scheme ... So, the first nic handle the NCC could give out would be AAA2000 and the last one ZZZ3999. This way you would have one global nic handle space, but still be able to assign handles at various different places without generating clashes. -Marten
- Previous message (by thread): Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles
- Next message (by thread): Unique NIC/RIPE/xxx-Handles
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]