<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 3 Feb 2022, at 11:10, Desiree Miloshevic <<a href="mailto:miloshevic@gmail.com" class="">miloshevic@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta charset="UTF-8" class=""><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; text-indent: -18pt;"><span class="" style="font-size: 14px;">Any solution for DNS resolvers should adhere to the Multistakeholder governance principles and respect the principles of distributed and modular nature of the DNS.<o:p class=""></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;"><span class="" style="font-size: 14px;">(Saying that<b class=""><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>mandated</b><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>use of centralised DNS resolvers is not a good principle and should not be only based on legislation). <o:p class=""></o:p></span><span class="" style="font-size: 14px;">It is questionable if the proposed solution would solve the problem described</span></p><div class=""><br class=""></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>If I can make a suggestion:</div><div><br class=""></div><div>"Governance of the DNS resolution chain, which form such an important element of everybody's Internet connectivity, should involve all stakeholders and can not solely rely on legislation and regulatory oversight."?</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Which you can follow with:</div><div><br class=""></div><div> "RIPE Community hopes that any winning bidder will adhere to what we see as a fundamental property of the Internet, with a diverse and competitive landscape, anchored on the principles of multistakeholder Internet governance."</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Which without saying it also emphasises points made earlier in connection to other EU proposals, including NIS 2 and at a later point can be easily re-used in arguing for RIPE or the RIR model?</div><div><br class=""></div><div>My 2 cents,</div><div><br class=""></div><div>MarcoH</div><br class=""></body></html>