<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small;color:#000099"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(34,34,34)">+1 </span><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr"><div>I completely agree! <br><br>2015-09-21<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:small"> 16:21 GMT+03:00 Jim Reid </span><span dir="ltr" style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:small"><<a href="mailto:jim@rfc1035.com" target="_blank">jim@rfc1035.com</a>></span><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-size:small">:</span><br></div><div><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span><br>
On 15 Sep 2015, at 18:26, Hans Petter Holen <<a href="mailto:hph@oslo.net" target="_blank">hph@oslo.net</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> I suggest that we appoint the two community-elected NRO Number Council representatives as our representatives to the Review Committee. The third, non-voting member of the Review Committee, who will be a RIPE NCC staff member, would then be appointed by the RIPE NCC Executive Board.<br>
><br>
> I believe that this is a straight forward and efficient proposal that would avoid an extra election process.<br>
<br>
</span>+1<br>
<br>
Just do it!<br></blockquote></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div>