This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] DNS4EU - proposal for a community response - draft
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Fwd: DNS4EU - community response draft
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] DNS4EU - proposal for a community response - draft
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Desiree Miloshevic
miloshevic at gmail.com
Thu Feb 3 20:16:01 CET 2022
Dear members, dear all Further to the RIPE NCC’s summary of the DNS4EU Open House discussion and further to your witnessing of our earlier 'transparent wordsmithing consultation' with other RIPE - WG Chairs, I’d like to propose the following high level statement draft for your consideration. Julf and myself, as Co-Chairs are in agreement with this draft statement and Achilleas had excused himself due to his affiliation with the EC. We’d like to know if there is some support from members for having a RIPE community response on this proposal? We would really appreciate your feedback or any comments you’d wish to make or if you'd like us to work further on this. Many thanks for your consideration and the feedback, Desiree -- Coop WG Co-Chair Proposed DNS4EU RIPE community statement comments 1. RIPE community believes that governance of the DNS resolution chain, which is such an important element of everybody's Internet connectivity, should involve all stakeholders and can not solely rely on legislation and regulatory oversight. 1. RIPE Community hopes that any winning bidder will adhere to what we see as a fundamental property of the Internet, with a diverse and competitive landscape, anchored on the principles of multistakeholder Internet governance. 2. RIPE Community believes that the responsibility of well-functioning Internet access including the DNS resolution is with the access providers. We believe it should stay that way. 3. We understand that to be able to minimise some risks when the end user selects a random DNS resolver, a possible and feasible solution is to have the access provider run their local DNS resolvers and/or an additional DNS resolver as a back-up. 4. We hope that the EU could allocate DNS4EU funds to the local Internet community and encourage Internet access providers to run their local DNS resolvers. Additionally, the funds can be also used towards the development of open source software for better and affordable DNS resolution services. On 2 Feb 2022, at 15:26, Chris Buckridge <chrisb at ripe.net> wrote: Dear colleagues, Thank you to all who joined for the RIPE NCC Open House discussion of DNS4EU on Monday, 31 January. We have posted a summary of some key points and links to the video archive here: https://labs.ripe.net/author/chrisb/dns4eu-ripe-ncc-open-house-discussion/ Cheers Chris -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https: <https://mailman.ripe.net/> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20220203/8911d9c5/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Fwd: DNS4EU - community response draft
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] DNS4EU - proposal for a community response - draft
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]