[cooperation-wg] Update on NIS 2: Proposed amendments by the Parliament alter scope on (root) DNS

Marco Hogewoning wrote on 07/05/2021 15:30:
> Personally I am not that worried about this particular amendment.
> IMHO the way it is worded leaves it fairly open as to what
> technologies to deploy, with RPKI being just flagged as an example.

ok noted.

> Important as well is that changing the recital like this, doesn't
> alter the scope of the directive. In that sense it only stresses the
> need for entities that fall within the scope to think about routing
> security and take appropriate measures to prevent the risks in that
> area. And I think we can all acknowledge that those risks do exist,
> so would be hard to argue against.
Yep, definitely no intention to argue against the principal.  We all - 
community, legislators, etc - agree on the importance of routing 
security.  The only concern I had was whether codifying specific ways of 
handling this was advisable, but if they're not being codified, that's fine.

Nick