This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] Any response to the NRO/ASO request to ICANN?
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Any response to the NRO/ASO request to ICANN?
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Any response to the NRO/ASO request to ICANN?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Jan 24 18:16:36 CET 2020
> On 24 Jan 2020, at 07:55, Richard Hill <rhill at hill-a.ch> wrote: > > Over the holidays, the Address Supporting Organization wrote to ICANN, acting as a component of the "Empowered Community". They asked for an inspection of ICANN records relating to the .ORG sale, including board minutes I’m doubly confused. Why is the ASO/NRO dabbling in domain name matters when its remit is numbering resources? It’s also not clear to me why the sale of PIR should be a matter for the ICANN board. But that’s a discussion that probably belongs elsewhere.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Any response to the NRO/ASO request to ICANN?
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Any response to the NRO/ASO request to ICANN?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]