This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Apr 9 17:10:59 CEST 2020
> On 9 Apr 2020, at 11:54, Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie> wrote: > > I think it important to reduce the essence of the message to a very few, > starkly simple, sentences, and then to assert this essence as often > as necessary, with reference to the supporting material when this is > appropriate. Indeed. That must be the key point of RIPE's response. However, I expect some administrations would appreciate wider industry statements of support. If the Internet sector in their respective companies remain silent on this topic, administrations may well be uneasy or unwilling to take a strong position on New IP (or Internet 2030 or Manynets or whatever it’s called) once it gets on the agenda for strategic meetings like WTSA. I hope this WG or the broader RIPE community will be able to encourage these companies to both speak up and engage with the relevant officials.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]