This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris Buckridge
chrisb at ripe.net
Mon Apr 6 14:14:04 CEST 2020
Dear colleagues, Just to also note that the RIPE NCC (in our capacity as an ITU Standardization Sector Member) made a submission to TSAG (the Standardization Sector Advisory Group) discussions earlier this year. Our submission can be found here: https://www.ripe.net/participate/internet-governance/multi-stakeholder-engagement/ripe-ncc_tsag_new-ip.pdf (also linked from this page: https://www.ripe.net/participate/internet-governance/multi-stakeholder-engagement/ripe-ncc-contributions-to-external-consultations) Marco Hogewoning will shortly publish a further update on RIPE Labs (look for that in the next week or so), and given the current interest, I have a feeling it would be useful to devote some time in the RIPE 80 Cooperation WG session to discussion of this topic, at the Co-Chairs’ discretion. Best regards, Chris > On 6 Apr 2020, at 12:44, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote: > > Daniel Karrenberg wrote on 06/04/2020 11:18: >> The IETF liaison statement is quite clear and complete, much clearer than the proposals. Rather than adding to the noise RIPE should consider supporting that statement. > > Would the NRO be interested in issuing a statement of support for the IETF position? > > Nick > >
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]