This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roland Perry
roland at internetpolicyagency.com
Wed Feb 22 21:57:34 CET 2017
In message <4C47D72B-8A25-4CFE-AF61-B7347F726579 at ripe.net>, at 12:32:33 on Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Chris Buckridge <chrisb at ripe.net> writes >LEA interest in reducing the use of CGN also came up for discussion at >the recent RIPE NCC Roundtable Meeting for Governments and Regulators >(held in Brussels on 24 January) The UK's approach, as expressed in the 2016 IP[1] Act, is not to prohibit CGN, but require operators to log who was using which IP, when. This is exactly the same as when Internet access was primarily by dial-up to banks of modems, and customers shared the IP Address of the modem. The ISPs were expected to log who had been online at a specific IP address at a specific time. [1] Investigatory Powers, not Internet Protocol. -- Roland Perry
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]