This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's Response to CWG-Internet Open Consultation "Building an enabling environment for access to the Internet”
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's Response to CWG-Internet Open Consultation "Building an enabling environment for access to the Internet”
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's Response to CWG-Internet Open Consultation "Building an enabling environment for access to the Internet”
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Oghia
mike.oghia at gmail.com
Thu Sep 22 08:21:36 CEST 2016
Hi Collin, I definitely think so. Especially if we can help translate why it isn't merely a technical function. That is, the Atlas program has many implications for business, civil society, and government as well -- each for different reasons. And it will only expand as more probes and anchors come online. Best, -Michael __________________ Michael J. Oghia iGmena <http://igmena.org/> communications manager 2016 ISOC IGF returning ambassador Independent #netgov consultant & editor Belgrade, Serbia Skype: mikeoghia Twitter <https://www.twitter.com/MikeOghia> *|* LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeoghia> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Collin Anderson <collin at measurementlab.net> wrote: > Thanks for sharing this Marco, > > Appears that a diversity of stakeholders have contributed to this process, > and some of the comments that I've read through have been interesting (if > only for who replied). > > Submissions: http://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/ > Pages/consultation-feb2016.aspx > > If I can put one thing on the CWG-Internet radar aside from IPv6, > measurement systems such as RIPE Atlas should also have a place in building > an enabling environment – something that is less likely to be covered by > other non-commercial or governmental comments. Would it be worthwhile to > also promote measurement of access in such forums? > > Cordially, > Collin > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at ripe.net> > wrote: > >> Dear colleagues, >> >> In response to the ITU Council Working Group on International >> Internet-related Public Policy Issues (CWG-Internet)’s open consultation >> “Building an enabling environment for access to the Internet”, we have >> prepared and submitted the attached contribution on behalf of the RIPE NCC. >> >> In our submission we emphasise the need for IPv6 and highlighted the >> ongoing coordinated efforts by all stakeholders to expedite the deployment >> of IPv6 in their networks, services and products. >> >> Should you have any questions regarding this consultation or our >> contribution, please do not hesitate to contact me or one of my colleagues. >> >> Regards, >> >> Marco Hogewoning >> >> External Relations >> RIPE NCC >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20160922/d93f6c69/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's Response to CWG-Internet Open Consultation "Building an enabling environment for access to the Internet”
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's Response to CWG-Internet Open Consultation "Building an enabling environment for access to the Internet”
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]