This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's response to ITU SG20 Liaison Statement
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's response to ITU SG20 Liaison Statement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Sun Oct 23 14:15:47 CEST 2016
Hi Marco - On 21.10.2016 10:55, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > As the response mentioned, we have attended the previous Study Group > meetings and of course during those we also had informal exchanges > with the rapporteurs, chairman and vice chairs of the group. that appears to have slipped through unread for some reason. My apologies. > The Liaison Statement did not come as a surprise as those were > discussed at the last SG20 meeting. In that sense, the formal > exchange of a Liaison Statement is a matter of ITU procedures, which > they have to follow. > > As all RIRs received similar Liaisons, some coordination took place > amongst the RIR staff and LACNIC and APNIC have also shared their > responses with us. > > Of course as a member participating in the Study Group, we can also > contribute directly and make interventions during the meetings, > should we feel that is necessary. Thanks for the clarification and the detailing. Have a good RIPE 73 week, all - best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's response to ITU SG20 Liaison Statement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]