[cooperation-wg] Status on co-chairs process?

Agree completely, Roger :)

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Roger Jørgensen <rogerj at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Meredith Whittaker
> <meredithrachel at google.com> wrote:
> > Hi Roger,
> >
> > Thank you for your constructive comment.
> >
> > To be clear, we made the announcement for candidates before this meeting.
> > And, candidates have come forward (and still can). I think we can discuss
> > what we'd like these people to do or not do, but I don't think it's
> > productive to walk back the process to review a conversation we could be
> > having in parallel.
>
> fair point, it's already started the process ongoing, it's strange but
> done is done:-)
>
> ... now I guess the important point is to get atleast one more chair
> to support you, I will suggest two more chairs so you are thee in
> total. These two should have different background and view on things.
> Get some diversity and experience to the table.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
> rogerj at gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
> http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger at jorgensen.no
>



-- 
Meredith Whittaker
Open Research Lead
Google NYC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20160526/facdff44/attachment.html>