This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] cooperation-wg Digest, Vol 53, Issue 16
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] cooperation-wg Digest, Vol 53, Issue 16
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] cooperation-wg Digest, Vol 53, Issue 16
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gordon Lennox
gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 23 16:01:52 CEST 2016
I agree. One of the nice things about this community is that you ask a question and you get a response. But when it comes to governments, both politicians and officials, it is not always about a lack of understanding. It can be about a very strong disagreement about values. I would add though that often it is not even just about “governments”. Even in a government from a particular culture and of a certain flavour there can be very strong internal / inter-departmental disagreements. And it is not always the “good guys” who have clue. Gordon > On 23 Jun 2016, at 15:37, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> wrote: > > The tricky ones are the ones where the views of the community > and the views of (some) governments are in conflict, and > activism, rather than education, is what is needed. In that > case we need to be very clear about who represents whom.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] cooperation-wg Digest, Vol 53, Issue 16
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] cooperation-wg Digest, Vol 53, Issue 16
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]