This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] The Working Group
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] The Working Group
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] The Working Group
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michele Neylon - Blacknight
michele at blacknight.com
Tue Jun 21 14:30:15 CEST 2016
Gordon Most of the other Working Groups within RIPE have specific “projects” they’re working on. I don’t think this group has any .. or maybe I missed that email ☺ Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 On 19/06/2016, 10:19, "cooperation-wg on behalf of Gordon Lennox" <cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> wrote: Jim asked some questions about a week ago and while we are waiting for a reply I feel I should ask one more. Do people actually want this Working Group? I see we get good attendance at the sessions during RIPE meetings. But traditionally WGs have also been very much about the mailing lists. A WG cannot just be about private conversations. The amount and style of contributions to this list, the lack of conversations about content, makes me feel that while people may be interested they are not actually interested enough to say anything. OK I have been on lists long enough to know that there are always many “lurkers”. Well we all know that. But there has to be some activity to make even that worthwhile. But I also note that while we had four candidates for co-chair they too seem remarkably silent. That is an indication of how they see the role of co-chair? I think it can be important for WGs to know what chairs and co-chairs think. I see this area as important. Well I would! And I am not giving up right now. But what to others think? Gordon
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] The Working Group
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] The Working Group
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]