This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] Co-chair attributes
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Co-chair attributes
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Co-chair attributes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Mon Jun 6 20:23:49 CEST 2016
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> wrote: <snip> > Where I diverge a little from Jim, and the topic has come up recently on this list, is when it comes to outreach and to what extent co-chairs are supposed to represent the WG and indeed RIPE elsewhere. <snip> > This area is a bit different from others and maybe particularly when it comes to outreach where NCC has been very much involved. <snip> > Where I am less comfortable is about outreach being part of the job description of WG Co-chairs. I also wonder to what extent participants in the WG can also take on this kind of task. I think this needs to be discussed further. In Madrid when we have our full complement of co-chairs? ... may I ask what we expect our chairs todo? Help RIPE NCC in the outreach, or help in the outreach-job by let all the other around RIPE have an arena to meet the community? If a chair is doing outreach, who are a chair of this WG representing? I would say none, whoever it is cannot represent us. Difficult. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Co-chair attributes
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Co-chair attributes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]