This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] The 5G consultation
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] The 5G consultation
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] The 5G consultation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gordon Lennox
gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 20 17:25:55 CEST 2016
Jim, I think the consultation "followed the rules". But were the rules chosen fully appropriate? I am not sure. But neither am I clear on a way forward. I guess they don't want a few hundred thousand responses. I doubt they could even handle that amount of data. But if you look how the targeted industries are lobbying - I guess enough people have read the articles, etc. - then the argument that they should be excused to an extent from the network neutrality AND that they should get public funding is strange. A lot of people were clearly interested in what Berec was doing. So how do they get involved here? Anyway you can always write to the appropriate Commissioner and/or your MEP and/or you local regulator. Gordon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20160720/b9930cde/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] The 5G consultation
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] The 5G consultation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]