This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] time-lines for co-chair appointments
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] time-lines for co-chair appointments
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Co-chairs - current status?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at ISOC.DE
Tue Jul 12 09:43:38 CEST 2016
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:58:52PM +0200, Johan Helsingius wrote: > I appreciate the expressions of support from both you and Nick, > but at the same time I agree that it is up to the current chair(s) > to decide, and I do feel that it is important the co-chairs are > people the current chair(s) feel happy to work with. I feel that we have a significant confusion regarding the chairs' role and position. <https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/coop/cooperation-wg-chair-selection-process> is quite clear in stating that the two or three chairs are collectively chairing the goup, but the WG gets to decide (which is not unlike the other RIPE WGs). I have not received signals that the WG was accidentally off track with combining its choices. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] time-lines for co-chair appointments
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Co-chairs - current status?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]