[cooperation-wg] time-lines for co-chair appointments

The "Cooperation WG Chair Selection Process” is here:

https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/coop/cooperation-wg-chair-selection-process

I would like this to be followed. Does anybody object?

In particular I note that "the Chair/s declare a decision, based on mailing list discussion, as they would do for a policy proposal.”

This implies that “Chair/s” ought not to insist on their own preferences and to ignore the WG. I do not think that is what Meredith has in mind. But I am still seeking clarity.

However, based on his contributions on the mailing list, I would like Julf to be a co-chair. I think a co-chair should be active, present.

Gordon


> On 11 Jul 2016, at 20:54, Meredith Whittaker <meredithrachel at google.com> wrote:
> 
> We would not be going back to a fait accompli. We would be making a decision following a month and some weeks deliberation on the list. 
> 
> However, the mode by which a decision gets made, process or no, is not clear or determined. As co-chair, I expressed my preferences as they relate to people I will be working and collaborating with. My preferences have not changed. That's what I'm able to do. I am not able to divine the "will of the group," nor is there a process drafted to do so. 
> 
> I appreciate your continued participation and your drive toward clarity, Gordon. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Meredith 
>