This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] IANA Review Committee Selection Process - RIPE Community Support
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] IANA Review Committee Selection Process - RIPE Community Support
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] IANA Review Committee Selection Process - RIPE Community Support
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Wed Sep 23 18:00:46 CEST 2015
Hans Petter, On 23/09/2015 06:13, Hans Petter Holen wrote: > Hi Brian, > Thanks for your questions and comments. > > On 21.09.15 10.58, Brian Nisbet wrote: >> >> I think this may be an elegant solution. I am slightly suspicious of >> any new piece of work which is supposed to be lightweight and is then >> given to already busy people, as it has a habit of spiralling. > > Personally I would imagine that this added workload is more than > manageable. Grans so. >> I would also welcome your thoughts on managing the difference between >> the term lengths of the two different posts? > Thats a good point. > I will propose that we modify the terms of the review committee to match > the ones of the NRO-NC. Sounds good and makes it all very easy indeed. Thanks, Brian
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] IANA Review Committee Selection Process - RIPE Community Support
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] IANA Review Committee Selection Process - RIPE Community Support
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]