[cooperation-wg] IANA Review Committee Selection Process - RIPE Community Support

Hi Brian,
Thanks for your questions and comments.

On 21.09.15 10.58, Brian Nisbet wrote:
>
> I think this may be an elegant solution. I am slightly suspicious of 
> any new piece of work which is supposed to be lightweight and is then 
> given to already busy people, as it has a habit of spiralling.
The NRO-NC already has the following responsibilities as ASO AC 
according to 3b in the MOU with ICANN:
https://archive.icann.org/en/aso/aso-mou-29oct04.htm
* a role in Global policy development
* make recommendations to the ICANN board on new LIRs
* selecting ICANN board member two out of three years
* make their own procedures

The work of the review committee is to give advice on IANA performance 
for the numbers community. We do not have any experience with how much 
work this is going to be, but if we look at the work IANA does for 
numbers - it is in the range of one request every second month on 
average. So I would assume reading trough the monthly reports once or 
twice a year and checking that the

Personally I would imagine that this added workload is more than manageable.

>
> I would also welcome your thoughts on managing the difference between 
> the term lengths of the two different posts?
Thats a good point.
I will propose that we modify the terms of the review committee to match 
the ones of the NRO-NC.

>
> That said, I don't think these are reasons to oppose your proposal, I 
> just want to make sure they've been thought about. 

Good point.

-- 
Hans Petter Holen
Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | hph at oslo.net | http://hph.oslo.net