This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] IANA Review Committee Selection Process - RIPE Community Support
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] IANA Review Committee Selection Process - RIPE Community Support
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Fwd: IANA Review Committee Selection Process - RIPE Community Support
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Sep 21 15:21:06 CEST 2015
On 15 Sep 2015, at 18:26, Hans Petter Holen <hph at oslo.net> wrote: > I suggest that we appoint the two community-elected NRO Number Council representatives as our representatives to the Review Committee. The third, non-voting member of the Review Committee, who will be a RIPE NCC staff member, would then be appointed by the RIPE NCC Executive Board. > > I believe that this is a straight forward and efficient proposal that would avoid an extra election process. +1 Just do it!
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] IANA Review Committee Selection Process - RIPE Community Support
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Fwd: IANA Review Committee Selection Process - RIPE Community Support
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]