[cooperation-wg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] Call for comments on the CRISP Review of the SLA

Dear Colleagues,

Please find below the CRISP Team’s review of the IANA Numbering Services SLA Draft produced by the RIR legal team. 

We welcome comments on this review on the <ianaxfer at nro.net> mailing list until Tuesday 9 June UTC23:59. 

Kind regards,

Nurani 
On behalf of the RIPE CRISP team


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
> Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] Call for comments on the CRISP Review of the SLA
> Date: 4 juni 2015 01:21:00 CEST
> To: "ianaxfer at nro.net" <ianaxfer at nro.net>
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> 
> 
> As announced by the NRO, the SLA text based on the numbers community proposal is open for the community consultation by the NRO.
> 
> https://www.nro.net/news/call-for-comments-for-a-draft-sla-for-the-iana-numbering-services
> 
> We would like to share the CRISP Team's review of the SLA, and welcome comments from the community on the review before: Tue 9th June UTC23:59. 
> 
> The CRISP Team review was based on the principles below:
> 
> - The review focuses and limits its scope on whether the SLA is consistent with the numbers community proposal.
> - Specific legal provisions in the SLA are therefore outside the scope of this review. 
> - We note that not all elements of the numbers community proposal which is to be implemented in the SLA;
>   There are implementation to be handled outside the SLA, such as transfer of the IPR which belong to the public domain (e.g.IANA trademark, iana.org domain), and setting up of the Review Committee.
> 
> Feedback from the community on <ianaxfer at nro.net> will be taken into consideration with the same principles as described above.
> 
> Overall, the CRISP Team found that the SLA is consistent with the numbers community proposal. 
> However there are a few points where we observed more clarifications are needed, could be read as more definitive than what has bene agreed, or the SLA text could be interpreted as not being consistent. 
> Please see the attached review for more details.
> 
> We note that on Article 10, there were some differences in opinion on whether it is consistent with the numbers community proposal.
> Further discussion in the CRISP Team did not reveal any opposition to the version of the response we are sharing now with the community, before the deadline for comments within the CRISP Team.
> 
> After closing the community feedback, we are planning to submit the CRISP Team's SLA review incorporating relevant community feedback to the NRO by 14th June UTC23:59 deadline.
> 
> 
> Izumi Okutani, Nurani Nimpuno
> Chair, Vice Chair of the CRISP Team
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Review of the SLA-20150603.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 98338 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20150604/bd0f20d2/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
> _______________________________________________
> ianaxfer mailing list
> ianaxfer at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer