This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] [NRO-IANAXFER] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to "CRISP - Process Concerns"
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] The CRISP Team Response to "CRISP - Process Concerns"
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] IANA stewardship transition session at ICANN52 Singapore (2/8 & 2/9)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Feb 6 10:16:20 CET 2015
On 5 Feb 2015, at 22:03, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> wrote: > claims of top-down decision-making and restriction of information > flow/transparency issues, the CRISP team have an extensive public written > record to show otherwise. It is abundantly clear both to observers and to > those who contributed that Guru Acharya's claims on this are untenable. Indeed.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] The CRISP Team Response to "CRISP - Process Concerns"
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] IANA stewardship transition session at ICANN52 Singapore (2/8 & 2/9)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]