This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] The CRISP Team Response to "Process concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] The CRISP Team Response to "Process concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] [NRO-IANAXFER] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to "Process concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Feb 5 15:50:10 CET 2015
On 5 Feb 2015, at 14:26, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> wrote: > In short, I don't see a problem with the CRISP proposal (+ repeat my > previous support for it) and am satisfied that Richard Hill's concerns are > either misplaced or else have been adequately addressed. Me too! I wholeheartedly support the CRISP proposal and the open process it used to engage with everyone and reach consensus.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] The CRISP Team Response to "Process concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] [NRO-IANAXFER] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to "Process concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]