[cooperation-wg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] 2nd Draft of IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions published

FYI.
Kind regards,

Nurani

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at netnod.se>
> Date: 28 april 2015 21:41:28 CEST
> To: ianaxfer at nro.net
> Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] 2nd Draft of IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions published
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> We would like to draw your attention to the 2nd Draft Proposal of the Cross Community Working Group to Develop an IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions, which has now been published:
> 
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-04-22-en
> 
> On this page, you will find the full proposal, the Chairs' Foreword summarising the proposal, instructions on how to provide feedback on the proposal, and a Public Comment Input Template. The comment period for this draft proposal is open until 20 May 2015. 
> 
> We would like to encourage anyone interested in the Names Community's proposal to read it and to provide feedback within the comment period. 
> 
> The CRISP team has started the work of conducting an analysis of the Names Community's proposal to identify any issues that may affect the Numbers Community. We hope to share this analysis with the community, once completed.
> 
> As you are awre, the CRISP chairs have also contacted the chairs of the Names Community, requesting them to communicate any issues they identify in their proposal that might affect the Numbers Community, before the final submission to the ICG. (See the forwarded mail below.) 
> 
> We are scheduling a teleconference with the chairs of the Names Community to discuss this. 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Izumi Okutani, CRISP chair
> Nurani Nimpuno, CRISP vice chair
> 
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> Date: 24 mars 2015 09:37:35 CET
>> From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
>> To: "ianaxfer at nro.net" <ianaxfer at nro.net>
>> Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] Fwd: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related Functions
>> 
>> FYI, based on discussions within the CRISP Team, I have made this request to CWG-Names chairs so we would be informed of any dicussions in the CWG-Names which affects the numbers community.
>> Still waiting for their response.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Izumi
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related Functions
>> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:57:55 +0900
>> From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
>> To: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>, Lise Fuhr <lise.fuhr at difo.dk>
>> CC: Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com>
>> 
>> Dear Jonathan and Lise,
>> 
>> 
>> I am writing to you as Chair of the Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship Proposal (CRISP) team, responsible for preparation of the numbers community's response to the ICG's Request for Proposals.
>> 
>> It was helpful to have the update on the CWG for Naming Related Functions progress at the session in Singapore, including the revised timeline of the process proposed by the CWG-Names, with a CWG-Names proposal submission in June later this year. This revised timeline increases the need for collaborative and constructive work in the ICG as well as between all three stakeholder communities to progress efficiently with the timeline. We remain positive that a proposal satisfactory to all parties, can be produced through this process.
>> 
>> The ICG's decision to seek proposals from the three separate affected communities reflects the distinct needs, mechanisms and historical development of these three communities. At the same time, developing a proposal that satisfactorily addresses stewardship of all the IANA functions is a priority for all parties.
>> 
>> With this in mind, I would like to request that the Chairs of the CWG-Names communicate directly to the Chair and Vice-Chair of the CRISP team, regarding any proposals or developments that might affect the numbers community in advance, and not wait for the final submission to the ICG.
>> 
>> This level of direct communication and collaboration will allow all communities to consider the impact and potential compatibility issues among the proposals ahead of the ICG consolidation process, consult appropriately within their communities, and, if necessary, develop appropriate responses efficiently, rather than wait for inputs from the numbers community after the ICG consolidates proposal from all the operational communities. Such bottom-up consideration by all communities will be essential to the authority and success of any final proposal to the NTIA.
>> 
>> I look forward to hearing of your continued progress, and to work collaboratively with you to achieve a successful outcome for all, of the IANA Stewardship transition.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> Izumi Okutani, Alan Barrett
>> CRISP Team Chair, Vice-Chair
>> ___________________
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ianaxfer mailing list
>> ianaxfer at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ianaxfer mailing list
> ianaxfer at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer