[cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources

In message <542185A7.8050803 at quark.net>, at 07:37:27 on Tue, 23 Sep 
2014, Andrew Dul <andrew.dul at quark.net> writes
>>> If we don't really want the organizational record in the IANA registry
>>> any more for the /8s,
>>
>> Which might be a good idea.
>>
>>> then we should instruct IANA to update the records in a way the
>>> community desires.
>>
>> Who are "we", and which community?
>>
>You and me, and the other interested parties in the internet community.
>We set internet number policy for the resources.

I see. So not whoever gets to be the new oversight body. Of course if 
"we" are the people running the oversight body (or perhaps it's supposed 
to be more *multi*stakeholder than that) then we could exert an 
influence via that route.

>> How do you make IANA comply? And if they don't, what sort of oversight
>> mechanism needs to be in place to escalate it to.
>
>We can ask IANA on the status of managing these records and if there is
>anything they are currently working on to make these records more up to
>date.
>
>If the current policy does not allow them to update the records as we
>would like,

The current policy might allow them, but for some reason they decline to 
update.

>we could put together a global policy which would instruct IANA how to 
>manage the records.

You are suggesting a replacement policy would place a duty on them, 
rather than simply allowing them to?
-- 
Roland Perry