This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roland Perry
roland at internetpolicyagency.com
Tue Sep 23 13:40:12 CEST 2014
In message <5420457C.5050408 at quark.net>, at 08:51:24 on Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Andrew Dul <andrew.dul at quark.net> writes >If we don't really want the organizational record in the IANA registry >any more for the /8s, Which might be a good idea. >then we should instruct IANA to update the records in a way the >community desires. Who are "we", and which community? How do you make IANA comply? And if they don't, what sort of oversight mechanism needs to be in place to escalate it to. ps There are also two /8's with a blank in the fourth column (053/8 & 057/8) so they need solving somehow. -- Roland Perry
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]