This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Sep 22 17:25:10 CEST 2014
On 22 Sep 2014, at 16:07, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> wrote: > as far as I was aware, this is the entire point of a RIR - to ensure accurate registration details of address holders. Did I miss something? Well the discussion seems to be about a handful of legacy /8s where IANA holds the registration details, not an RIR. Unless I'm more confused than usual, the accuracy of the registration details for 51/8 (say) are not a matter for RIPE or the NCC. Maybe they should be. But that's another discussion altogether. Probably. BTW, that /8 has never been routed on the Internet (bogus announcements excepted) and probably never will be. That's why I'm so doubtful if it matters operationally what the name of the organisation holding that space happens to be this week. After all, it's not as if one of the biggest departments of Her Majesty's Government is well hidden. YMMV.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]