This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Seun Ojedeji
seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Thu Sep 18 16:22:26 CEST 2014
sent from Google nexus 4 kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 18 Sep 2014 15:00, "Richard Hill" <rhill at hill-a.ch> wrote: > > Good point. So maybe all that is needed is for the RIRs to publish the > blocks that are assigned to them, so that it is easy to find out which WHOIS > to query. > And you think this is currently not happening or perhaps it needs to be improved? > Or maybe it would suffice to have an aggregated WHOIS. > Same comment as above. > >If the NRO is to take on that role, it > > will need extra funding and infrastructure. Which will presumably > > have to come from the RIRs who are already providing the funds > > and infrastructure which currently supports this function. > > True. But the RIRs at present do make a financial contribution to ICANN, > presumably in part to fund the IANA function for the IP addresses. > But you want them to pay the contribution to IANA instead? Cheers! > SNIP > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20140918/2c99821c/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]