This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] IANA discussions: ENOG 7
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] consensus on the NTIA-IANA proposal
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Minutes of the Coop-WG meeting during RIPE 68 in Warsaw - Updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Roy
twolf.om at gmail.com
Thu Jun 5 14:02:35 CEST 2014
That makes more sense and much better phrased for the correct meaning. I thought that is what you meant but wanted to be sure. Thanks for the clarification Tim Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 5, 2014, at 14:35, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote: > >> On 5.06.14 10:57 , Tim Roy wrote: >> I would think that RIPE NCC would have an interest in DNS operations since it relates to the numbers. >> >>>> On Jun 5, 2014, at 12:32, Chris Buckridge <chrisb at ripe.net> wrote: >>>> ... >>>> - The RIPE NCC is not interested in DNS operations and should not be put under that umbrella. > > > Unfortunate choice of words. I assume what was intended was something > like "RIPE and RIPE NCC are not interested in the oversight of > maintenance of the DNS root zone." > > Of course the RIPE NCC is interested in DNS operations as we maintain > and serve reverse DNS. We also operate k.root-servers.net and provide > measurements and statistics about DNS. > > Daniel >
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] consensus on the NTIA-IANA proposal
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Minutes of the Coop-WG meeting during RIPE 68 in Warsaw - Updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]